Saturday, July 18, 2015


The Road to Paris
The first, second, fourth and fifth largest emitters[1] of the world have submitted their Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDC) or in other words, their climate change action plan to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in run up to the Paris Climate Change Summit.

The EU has committed to cut its emissions by 40%, compared with 1990 levels, by 2030. The US will cut its emissions by 26% to 28%, compared with 2005 levels, by 2025. China has agreed to peak its emissions by 2030.

China ignited hopes globally that a sustainable future need not remain a pipe dream. China submitted a very ambitious, yet achievable emissions-reduction goal. The Chinese government has set a target of peaking its carbon dioxide emissions by 2030 or earlier, reduce carbon intensity by 60-65% relative to 2005 levels, increase the share of non-fossil fuels in primary energy consumption to 20% and increase forest cover by 4.5 billion cubic metres relative to 2005 levels. Japan, the fifth largest emitter, has also set an ambitious target for renewable energy at 22 to 24% of the mix, liquefied natural gas at 27% and coal at 26%.

All eyes are now set on the third largest (and soon to be the second biggest) emitter of the world – India.

The Indian government’s position on climate change has been paradoxical. While the Union Minster of Environment, Forests and Climate Change has made stern remarks that India will not follow a low carbon growth path and that developed economies must cut emissions to compensate for the historical error, the Prime Minister has set an ambitious target of 175 GW renewable energy capacity (over 20% in the total energy mix) by 2022. This target, by all liberal estimates, appears extremely ambitious. While India may take a righteous ‘emit now and pay later’ position, it is not in the country’s interest to walk a carbon-intense growth path especially because of its own vulnerabilities. There are reasons beyond economy and sustainability for why India must commit to a strong emission cut plan ahead of the Paris Summit.

1.      India’s trapped thermal deposits
India is the fourth largest producer and the second biggest consumer of coal. India’s large coal deposits are trapped under its forest land. Exploring this untapped energy would not only mean additional emissions but massive deforestation and subsequent marginalization of the country’s large tribal population. It would be naïve to ignore the magnitude of violent revolts by tribal communities across Indian states that have high deposits of natural resources.

2.      Vulnerable populations
Smallest climatic alterations, natural disasters or climate-induced epidemic affect the most populous, poorest and the marginalized first. India is the second most populous country in the world and is set to overtake China in 2030 (whose emissions are likely to peak in the same year). Air pollution causes 8 million deaths every year in India. This is about 30% of the total deaths globally due to air pollution, according to World Health Organization’s report on Health and Environment released in May 2015. Delhi, the world’s most polluted city, recorded a whopping 300 percent rise in respiratory illness cases between 2007-2008 and 2013-2014. India reported about 2000 heat-related deaths in the summer of 2015. India's Minister of Science and Technology and Earth Sciences blamed the heat deaths squarely on climate change. Under 4°C warming, the west coast and southern India are projected to shift to new, high-temperature climatic regimes with significant impacts on agriculture. In 1987 and 2002-2003, droughts affected more than half of India’s crop area and led to a huge fall in crop production. Even without climate change, 15% of India’s groundwater resources are overexploited. 

3.      Rising mean sea level and India’s long coastline
India’s 7,517 kilometer long coastline is highly vulnerable to climatic changes. The mean sea levels in South Asia are constantly rising. This is adversely affecting the coastal marine and plant lives. This will also immensely impact millions who are dependent on sea for a living. India’s financial nerve Mumbai has the world’s largest population exposed to coastal flooding, with large parts of the city built on reclaimed land, below the high-tide mark. The city received the highest ever single-day rainfall of 994 mm and subsequent flooding in 2005 which claimed over 1000 lives.

Despite its intense emission levels, US and China will be in an advantageous position at Paris. The two countries signed a historic agreement to reduce emissions in November 2014. While emissions from the US are poised to decline gradually over the next decade as a natural consequence of growth, technological advancements and addition of renewable capacities; China has shown remarkable efforts in mitigating its carbon emissions. China is the largest carbon emitter and has second largest per capita emission globally. It is the largest importer of fossil fuels, including coal, and raw materials like iron ore and cement that are essential for what the world calls ‘development’. Chinese developmental efforts have borne fruit and millions have broken free from the clutch of poverty after decades of despair. This has however, come at an enormous ecological cost to the planet. China, which played a rather negative role at the failed Copenhagen Climate Summit in 2009, has surprised many by this announcement but the largest polluter seems to have realized its responsibility of cutting down the black smoke. It has added an average of 15 GW renewable capacity annually in the last three years and will continue to expand its green energy sector at a faster rate.

India is at a peculiar juncture in time when it has to grow as well as grow in a sustainable way. In India coal is used to power more than half of the country’s electricity generation. In 2010, India introduced a nationwide carbon tax of Rs 50 per metric ton on coal and today it stands at Rs 200 per metric ton. While a tax on carbon is the most direct method to systematically approach the greenhouse gas emission cuts, a small tax will not amount to any substantial reduction in emissions. The share of renewables in India’s energy mix is less than 9 percent. The only way forward is to improve renewable energy capacity addition.

It is therefore all the more in India’s strategic, ecological and economic interest to envision a future which is sustainable.



[1] US, China, EU and Japan 

No comments:

Post a Comment